to subscribe to the feed | to subscribe by mail

Digg, to the sale for US $ 300 millions

Is that thing about seriously the bubble 2.0?, or: porqué is moving the market of the social networks?. Digg has been a forced place of reference of what knows 2.0 as the Web, and has been per months, a place with many popularity. For several months it began being speculated on his possible evaluation on the market, millionairess saying is of step. Some of them were suggesting more, other all that less, but they all were coinciding that it was a fortune what was costing this place. ¿porqué se está moviendo el mercado de las redes sociales?. Digg ha sido un sitio obligado de referencia de lo que se conoce como la Web 2.0, y ha sido por meses, un sitio con muchísima popularidad. Desde hace varios meses se empezaba a especular sobre su posible valoración en el mercado, millonaria dicho sea de paso. Algunos sugerían más, otros cuantos menos, pero todos coincidían en que era una millonada lo que valía este sitio.

Reading TechCrunch, I meet that Digg would be to the sale for approximately US $ 300,000,000, in average $ 77 dollars for every registered user. After the scandals that formed for supposed "mafias" controlling the appearances in front, the tendency began the casualty of which it was one day the most famous page between the addicts to the technology. Now they have arisen much more alternative that they are winning momentum, and do not discard the possibility that in a few months, Digg stops being an important prop in the network. Ahora han surgido mucho más alternativas que están ganando momentum, y no descarten la posibilidad de que en unos meses, Digg deje de ser un pilar importante en la red.

To me what turns out to be curious to me is that now they have hired the company Allen and Company, to put itself in sale for this quantity. Will it be that the bubble really is going to exploit?. Anyway, this sale is almost a fact, and inside soon we are going to begin seeing possible buyers, with what perhaps there gets lost the "neutrality" that still existed in Digg. For another people, like the magnate of the sales, ShoeMoney, the Digg traffic is a garbage, because only it makes you rise in the alexa ránking and wastes resources of your servant, but it does not bring you quality things. It is the point of view of each one, but I think that the Digg slope started already long ago, and as well they say, prevention is better, so the creators of the place prefer to gain themselves some millions now, to see how the actions of desploman later. De cualquier modo, esta venta es casi un hecho, y dentro de pronto vamos a empezar a ver a posibles compradores, con lo que quizá se pierda la “neutralidad” que aún había en Digg. Para otra gente, como el magnate de las ventas, ShoeMoney, el tráfico de Digg es una basura, porque sólo te hace subir en el ránking de alexa y desperdicia recursos de tu servidor, pero no te aporta cosas de calidad. Es el punto de vista de cada uno, pero yo pienso que el declive de Digg empezó ya hace mucho, y como bien dicen, más vale prevenir, así que los creadores del sitio prefieren ganarse algunos millones ahora, a ver cómo las acciones de desploman después

del.icio.usStumble UponMr. WongWiggle meTec. FresquiSeason me with chili
Subscribe to the feed

5 persons have left a comment

  1. comment Youtube says:
    December 18, 2007 at 4:45 pm
    Gravatar

    Google also will go to get into this, because with them one never knows:?

  2. comment Alan says:
    December 18, 2007 at 7:10 pm
    Gravatar

    Jeje, was missing more, we are not necessary to surprise if Google buys Digg, after everything, many histories that reach front are of Google xD

  3. comment Joni B. says:
    December 21, 2007 at 8:58 am
    Gravatar

    problem is not done by the price that sure google buys it!!.

    greetings.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks at this entry

  1. trackbackThe Digg song | Bitperbit
  2. trackbackBlogSanJuan »A news portal!!

What do you think? It leaves a comment

The fields marked with (*) are obligatory

Tags XHTML: You can use these tags in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

free web site hit counter